What can you actually ask ChatGPT to do?
Practical ChatGPT requests for email, summaries, comparisons, and explanations, with a five-point check before you use the result.
Start with a concrete task. Each guide shows how to inspect the result and where the method has limits.
Prompts, privacy, email, documents and practical comparisons.
Practical ChatGPT requests for email, summaries, comparisons, and explanations, with a five-point check before you use the result.
Use a coverage map, source references, and a separate register for amounts and dates before trusting an AI document summary.
A worked comparison of two service quotes: normalize the term, calculate total cost, surface missing conditions, and keep a source record.
A beginner-friendly route through AI Foundations, Applied AI Foundations, and Agents and Workflows, with a task to try after each.
A four-part prompt for beginners: goal, context, output format, and missing questions, tested against a vague request.
A practical check for AI-generated answers: separate facts from advice, trace primary sources, verify dates and numbers, and scale the effort to the risk.
A simple checklist for passwords, client data, contracts, medical records, screenshots, and safer ways to ask for help.
A practical email-writing workflow: give the right facts, request two tones, remove boilerplate, and check the final draft before sending.
Repository instructions, Git, tool permissions, review and security.
A review protocol for GitHub Agentic Autofix: what CodeQL validation proves, how to test a proposed fix independently, and when to hold a draft PR.
A practical trust map for web and coding agents: external data, verified metadata, least privilege, approval gates and provenance.
How a skill, an MCP server and an Agent Plugin differ, what portability covers, and what to inspect before installing one.
A read-only pilot for GitHub pull-request event tasks: narrow filters, untrusted comments, minimum access and human review.
Check the repository, scope, worktree, permissions, diff, tests and human review before accepting a Codex change.
A first-session checklist for Codex via GitHub Copilot in JetBrains, with clear distinctions between provider, model, MCP, skills and plugins.
A cautious first scan: inspect report, findings, manifest and coverage, validate a candidate issue, then compare a tested fix.
How to pilot Copilot approval assessments on low-risk paths without treating an AI approval as an independent human review.
A low-risk pilot for Copilot local sandboxing: check filesystem and network boundaries, credentials and bypass approvals.
A real source-confusion case and a fail-closed method to verify that Codex uses a GitHub Projects MCP tool instead of a related issue.
A small observable pilot for a managed agent session: synthetic files, restricted network, isolated credentials, logs and success checks.
A controlled rollout of Agent Merge for PR feedback, failed checks and conflicts, with a human gate for consequential merges.
Assign one owner per file, isolate writes and integrate sequentially when working with multiple VS Code agent sessions.
Use them on non-sensitive material and verify important claims.
Goal: [what you want to achieve]
Context: [only the details needed]
Format: [how the answer should look]
If something essential is missing, ask up to three questions before answering. Review this answer critically. Separate facts, inferences and suggestions. Identify dates and numbers I must verify, name primary sources to consult, and state what you are uncertain about. Compare these two offers without deciding for me. Show total cost over the same period, one-time fees, exclusions, risks, missing data and questions to ask. Show the formula for each total. It should not make a consequential decision for you without checks.